Post by account_disabled on Jan 6, 2024 0:26:42 GMT -5
Athat in the end they want to share on their social networks or any other channel. However its popularity is one of the main reasons why we must be especially careful with the material we upload to it. Recently the Spanish Data Protection Agency has fined an Alicante company Digiman Alicante for having published a video on YouTube showing the image of a worker who is no longer part of the workforce. The result a euro fine for not having removed the video in question on time. plataforma de vdeo online Be careful what you upload to YouTube According to the information published in the specialized media.
Confilegal the former worker affirms that during the time he remained at the company he gave his verbal authorization allowing publication on the web pages catalog social networks web platforms etc. of images where Phone Number List it appeared in order for the company to promote its services and facilities. However this same consent was understood to end at the same time that the employment relationship ended as the worker made known to the company on up to three occasions. Requesting the removal of the images in which it appeared during the years and . In August the former worker once again realized that his image continued to appear in a video that was hosted on the YouTube channel.
And that was when he started the whole dispute again given the opposing points of view between all the parties involved regarding his possible identification. Identification of the plaintiff in the video that it was practically impossible to recognize the image of the former worker since it was hidden behind vinyl. Specifically it said that the image of the object of this file would be anonymized and does not involve the processing of personal data adding furthermore that it is difficult to believe that someone could identify the claimant in said image since.
Confilegal the former worker affirms that during the time he remained at the company he gave his verbal authorization allowing publication on the web pages catalog social networks web platforms etc. of images where Phone Number List it appeared in order for the company to promote its services and facilities. However this same consent was understood to end at the same time that the employment relationship ended as the worker made known to the company on up to three occasions. Requesting the removal of the images in which it appeared during the years and . In August the former worker once again realized that his image continued to appear in a video that was hosted on the YouTube channel.
And that was when he started the whole dispute again given the opposing points of view between all the parties involved regarding his possible identification. Identification of the plaintiff in the video that it was practically impossible to recognize the image of the former worker since it was hidden behind vinyl. Specifically it said that the image of the object of this file would be anonymized and does not involve the processing of personal data adding furthermore that it is difficult to believe that someone could identify the claimant in said image since.